Code Watchdog Criticises Insurer for Misleading Rejection Letters

0

The situation was highlighted by the Committee's chair, Jan McClelland, who underscored that every consumer has the right to transparent communication, especially when denied an insurance policy. McClelland pointed out that the insurer incorrectly communicated that the denials couldn't be reconsidered unless new information was provided, which was not the case.

According to the committee, 170 applicants were affected by this communication failure. The insurer has now been directed to reassess its decision letters, as well as its operator scripts, and to report its findings back to the committee. The initial issue, reported in November 2023, involved template letters that omitted crucial information about customers' rights to submit additional information or to seek a review or file a complaint.

Efforts to correct the error were initially made by the insurer with updated letters. However, these attempts fell short of the standards set by the Life Insurance Code of Practice. The compliance committee noted that the language used implied finality in the decision while simultaneously suggesting, albeit ambiguously, the possibility of a review.

The insurer's internal oversight was also criticised for failing to catch and address this lapse, leading to customer confusion. Instead of directly notifying affected customers, the insurer relied on financial advisers to communicate the information, which was inadequate according to the committee. McClelland noted that the oversight in internal checks left customers inadequately informed.

Despite not naming the insurer, the committee acknowledged the provider's efforts to rectify the situation, which played a role in withholding the name from the public.

Published:Tuesday, 24th Jun 2025
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Code Watchdog Criticises Insurer for Misleading Rejection Letters 24 Jun 2025: Paige Estritori The Life Code Compliance Committee has recently reprimanded a life insurance provider for issuing misleading rejection letters to policy applicants. These letters were deemed 'ambiguous and contradictory' and failed to clearly inform applicants of their review options after being denied coverage. - read more

Insurer Ordered to Pay Full Claim for Confusing Patio Coverage 23 Jun 2025: Paige Estritori A recent ruling mandates that an insurer must fully honor a storm-related claim due to ambiguous policy wording regarding items in open areas. The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) determined that the insurer's restriction on coverage for items in a patio area was unfounded, as the policy's phrasing was not clear. - read more

Australia Sees Dramatic Drop in Catastrophe Losses 23 Jun 2025: Paige Estritori Last year saw Australia's insured catastrophe losses plummet to just $500 million, marking the lowest level since 2004, according to Aon's latest Climate and Catastrophe Insight report. Notably, the Insurance Council of Australia reported no disasters for the year, a situation not seen since 1982. This comes in stark contrast to 2023, when disaster-related insured losses soared to over $3.6 billion. - read more

Half a Million Australian Homes at Risk of Becoming Uninsurable, Climate Agency Reports 21 Jun 2025: Paige Estritori The Climate Change Authority has released a concerning report highlighting that, without immediate intervention, extreme natural hazards could cost Australians approximately $8.7 billion annually by 2050. The report urges the federal government to spearhead a comprehensive and well-coordinated national adaptation agenda to mitigate these risks. - read more

Red Sea Unrest: Insurer Denies Cruise Cancellation Claim 20 Jun 2025: Paige Estritori An Australian travel policyholder has been denied a claim payout after his planned cruise in the Red Sea was cancelled due to conflict. The insurer, Southern Cross, invoked its policy's war and violence exclusion clause, as disturbances in the region were linked to military activities, rendering the claim invalid. - read more