Insurer Penalized for Mishandling Storm Damage Claim

1

The homeowner reported his damages following severe storms that hit in February 2022. The insurance company consulted a builder, referred to as PB, to evaluate the property damages.

PB's assessment claimed that the home had pre-existing damage and lacked waterproof integrity. Specific issues highlighted included clogged gutters, cracked and missing roof tiles, and an unconventional roofing method that permitted water intrusion.

According to PB, the storm did not directly damage the roof but worsened existing issues. This led Auto & General to deny the claim and revoke the policy in October 2022, accusing the homeowner of misrepresenting the property's condition as "good" when the policy began and during its renewal.

The homeowner contested the insurer’s stance, arguing that it was unjust. He presented a separate builder’s report, along with written statements and photographs, which demonstrated a lack of prior wall or ceiling damage.

The policyholder attributed the defects cited by PB to partial make-safe work, asserting that the gutters had been regularly maintained prior to the storm. He also mentioned the emergence of storm-induced mold in sections of his home.

While Auto & General did ultimately reverse its initial claim denial and arrange for a cash settlement the preceding October, the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has decreed that the company must retract its claims of disclosure breach and issue a formal apology.

The AFCA identified “multiple erroneous assertions by PB alleging the complainant had neglected to maintain the property appropriately before the storm,” for which the homeowner provided contradicting proof.

The authority’s ombudsman commented, "I am satisfied the complainant reasonably believed that his home was in good condition and waterproof at the time of policy renewal in July 2021. Moreover, I think a reasonable person would agree with the complainant’s evaluation of his home's condition."

They further stated, "I conclude that the complainant did not misrepresent the property's state. Thus, the insurer made a mistake in deciding to cancel the policy."

The insurer has been directed to pay $2000 to cover non-financial losses due to its oversight in investigating the homeowner’s challenges to PB’s report, failure to acknowledge present mould, and incomplete make-safe actions.

The AFCA concluded that Auto & General should have sought a second, independent evaluation of PB’s findings. The resultant protracted claim process subjected the policyholder and his family to undue stress and anxiety.

The original source of this matter was reported by the Insurance News.

Published:Thursday, 23rd Jan 2025
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

QBE Faces Legal Action Over Misleading Discount Practices

10 Oct 2025: Paige Estritori

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has initiated legal proceedings against QBE Insurance, alleging that the insurer misled more than 500,000 customers regarding promised discounts on various insurance products between July 2017 and September 2022. This action underscores the regulator's commitment to ensuring transparency and fairness within the insurance sector. - read more

Debate Intensifies Over Proposed NSW Strata Commission Ban

10 Oct 2025: Paige Estritori

The New South Wales (NSW) government's proposal to ban commissions on strata insurance has ignited a contentious debate between consumer advocacy groups and industry leaders. This reform aims to eliminate potential conflicts of interest and enhance transparency within the strata management sector. - read more

Steadfast Group's Strata Insurance Practices Under Investigation

10 Oct 2025: Paige Estritori

Steadfast Group, Australia's largest strata insurance broker, is currently under scrutiny following allegations that it misled customers by not disclosing more affordable insurance options from competitors. This situation has prompted the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) to advocate for a ban on commissions within the strata insurance market, citing concerns over undisclosed payments that may be inflating costs for apartment owners. - read more

Netstrata's Practices Prompt Industry-Wide Strata Management Reforms

02 Oct 2025: Paige Estritori

Recent investigations have brought to light concerning practices within Australia's strata management sector, particularly involving Netstrata, a prominent firm managing over 1,000 buildings and 35,000 apartments across New South Wales. Reports indicate that Netstrata has been charging apartment owners insurance brokerage fees significantly higher than industry standards, with some fees reaching up to six times the typical rate. This revelation has ignited a broader discussion on the need for transparency and reform within the industry. - read more

Sure Insurance's $20 Million Strata Coverage Boosts Affordability in Northern Queensland

02 Oct 2025: Paige Estritori

In a significant move to address insurance affordability and accessibility, Sure Insurance has expanded its residential strata insurance coverage to $20 million, up from the previous limit of $5 million. This enhancement is particularly targeted at apartment complexes in Northern and Regional Queensland, regions that have faced challenges in securing adequate and affordable insurance coverage. - read more

Click for more Insurance News