Insurer Penalized for Mishandling Storm Damage Claim
Insurer Penalized for Mishandling Storm Damage Claim
The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.
In a recent development, Auto & General has been instructed to both apologize and compensate a Brisbane property owner with a $2000 payment after an inadequate review of his storm damage claim led to an initial denial of coverage and subsequent policy cancellation.
The homeowner reported his damages following severe storms that hit in February 2022. The insurance company consulted a builder, referred to as PB, to evaluate the property damages.
PB's assessment claimed that the home had pre-existing damage and lacked waterproof integrity. Specific issues highlighted included clogged gutters, cracked and missing roof tiles, and an unconventional roofing method that permitted water intrusion.
According to PB, the storm did not directly damage the roof but worsened existing issues. This led Auto & General to deny the claim and revoke the policy in October 2022, accusing the homeowner of misrepresenting the property's condition as "good" when the policy began and during its renewal.
The homeowner contested the insurer’s stance, arguing that it was unjust. He presented a separate builder’s report, along with written statements and photographs, which demonstrated a lack of prior wall or ceiling damage.
The policyholder attributed the defects cited by PB to partial make-safe work, asserting that the gutters had been regularly maintained prior to the storm. He also mentioned the emergence of storm-induced mold in sections of his home.
While Auto & General did ultimately reverse its initial claim denial and arrange for a cash settlement the preceding October, the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has decreed that the company must retract its claims of disclosure breach and issue a formal apology.
The AFCA identified “multiple erroneous assertions by PB alleging the complainant had neglected to maintain the property appropriately before the storm,†for which the homeowner provided contradicting proof.
The authority’s ombudsman commented, "I am satisfied the complainant reasonably believed that his home was in good condition and waterproof at the time of policy renewal in July 2021. Moreover, I think a reasonable person would agree with the complainant’s evaluation of his home's condition."
They further stated, "I conclude that the complainant did not misrepresent the property's state. Thus, the insurer made a mistake in deciding to cancel the policy."
The insurer has been directed to pay $2000 to cover non-financial losses due to its oversight in investigating the homeowner’s challenges to PB’s report, failure to acknowledge present mould, and incomplete make-safe actions.
The AFCA concluded that Auto & General should have sought a second, independent evaluation of PB’s findings. The resultant protracted claim process subjected the policyholder and his family to undue stress and anxiety.
The original source of this matter was reported by the Insurance News.
Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.
Australia's latest insurance affordability signals are a timely reminder that premium pressure is not confined to detached homes. For strata communities, the same forces affecting household insurance, including natural hazard exposure, higher repair costs, reinsurance pricing and insurer risk selection, can be amplified across an entire apartment building, townhouse complex or mixed-use scheme. - read more
Australia's latest construction cost signals suggest some relief from the sharpest building inflation of recent years, but strata committees should be careful not to treat moderation as a reason to relax their insurance settings. For apartment buildings, townhouse complexes and mixed-use schemes, the key issue is not simply whether costs are rising more slowly. It is whether the current sum insured still reflects the realistic cost of reinstating the entire property after a major insured event. - read more
New South Wales strata communities are entering a more demanding insurance governance environment, with reforms placing greater emphasis on disclosure, quote processes and the way insurance-related benefits are explained to owners. For committees and owners corporations, the change is less about paperwork for its own sake and more about improving confidence that the building's cover has been tested properly before renewal decisions are made. - read more
New South Wales strata communities should keep a close watch on renewed efforts to reform the way emergency services are funded through insurance premiums. The long-running concern is that adding emergency services charges to insurance bills can make cover look more expensive, particularly for apartment buildings, mixed-use schemes and larger owners corporations already managing high rebuilding values and complex risk profiles. - read more
A fresh review of Australia’s cyclone reinsurance pool has put northern strata insurance affordability back in focus, particularly for apartment buildings and mixed-use schemes exposed to cyclone, flood and storm surge risk. The pool was designed to improve insurer capacity and ease premium pressure in cyclone-prone regions, but the latest discussion suggests that outcomes are still uneven for complex strata properties. - read more
Building valuations and replacement cost estimates help determine the sum insured for a strata property. If those estimates are too low, an owners corporation may face underinsurance, reduced claim outcomes or unexpected costs after a major loss. - read more
Preparing the right information before requesting a strata insurance quote or renewal review can help insurers and brokers assess the scheme more accurately. This guide explains the common details strata managers, committees and owners corporations may need to gather. - read more
Commercial and residential strata insurance both protect strata-titled buildings and common property, but the risks, policy considerations and information insurers assess can differ significantly. - read more
Strata insurance is a specialized form of insurance designed to protect the common property and assets of a strata titled property, which is especially important for property owners in Australia. It provides coverage for shared areas such as hallways, gardens, and pools, as well as liability protection for incidents that may occur in these common spaces. - read more
Strata insurance is generally a legal obligation for Australian strata schemes, but the exact requirements differ between states and territories. This guide explains how obligations commonly work, what committees and owners should check, and why scheme type, location and policy wording matter. - read more
Knowledgebase
Policyholder: The individual or entity who owns the insurance policy.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.